ISO 22000 Audit Guide: How to Pass First Time

ISO 22000 Audit Guide How to Pass First Time
Food Safety

ISO 22000 Audit Guide: How to Pass First Time

Last Updated on December 12, 2025 by Melissa Lazaro

How to Approach an ISO 22000 Audit with Confidence

If there’s one thing I’ve learned after guiding food manufacturers, processors, and distributors through ISO 22000 audits, it’s this: most audit problems don’t come from complex technical gaps. They come from preparation that looks good on paper but isn’t fully embedded in daily operations.

The ISO 22000 audit isn’t designed to trick you. It’s designed to confirm one thing—whether your food-safety management system works consistently, under real conditions, with real people.

This guide is written for organizations aiming to pass the ISO 22000 audit on the first attempt. Not by rushing before audit day, but by understanding how auditors think, what they focus on, and how to present a system that is controlled, stable, and effective.

By the end, you’ll understand the full audit journey—from preparation to Stage 1, Stage 2, and closing findings—so you can walk into your audit calm, structured, and confident.

Understanding the ISO 22000 Audit Process

Before preparing for the audit, it’s important to understand what the ISO 22000 audit actually is.

The certification audit is not a document review exercise. Auditors are evaluating whether your FSMS is designed correctly, implemented consistently, and capable of controlling food-safety hazards over time.

The audit process typically includes:

  • A Stage 1 audit to assess readiness
  • A Stage 2 audit to verify implementation and effectiveness
  • Ongoing surveillance audits after certification

Auditors work using a process-based approach. They follow the flow of your operations, trace hazards from raw material to finished product, and look for alignment between what you documented and what actually happens.

This is important because even strong documentation won’t protect you if day-to-day practices don’t match it.

Pro Tip: Always think in terms of evidence flow. If a hazard exists, auditors will look for the control, the record, and the person responsible.

Common Pitfall: Treating the audit as a checklist exercise rather than a system evaluation.

ISO 22000 Audit Guide: How to Pass First Time Pre-Audit Preparation: Building Audit Readiness Before the Auditor Arrives

Successful audits are decided long before the audit date.

Audit readiness means your FSMS has been operating consistently—not just completed. Certification bodies expect to see evidence that your system is stable and mature.

Strong pre-audit preparation includes:

  • A defined and accurate certification scope
  • Implemented PRPs relevant to your operations
  • A completed and logical hazard analysis
  • CCP and OPRP controls operating consistently
  • Records available for a reasonable period
  • Completed internal audits
  • A meaningful management review

In one audit I supported, two companies had similar processes and documentation. One passed smoothly. The other faced delays. The difference wasn’t complexity—it was that one had three months of consistent records, while the other relied on last-minute completion.

Pro Tip: Don’t schedule the audit until your system has been running long enough to show patterns, not just compliance.

Common Pitfall: Treating the audit date as the start of implementation instead of the confirmation of it.

Stage 1 Audit: How to Pass the Readiness Review Without Delays

Stage 1 is where auditors decide whether you’re ready for the main audit.

During Stage 1, auditors typically review:

  • Your FSMS structure and scope
  • PRPs and facility controls
  • Hazard-analysis logic
  • CCP and OPRP identification
  • Legal and regulatory awareness
  • Internal audit and management review status

Stage 1 findings often delay certification—not because of major failures, but because of gaps in readiness.

Auditors are asking one key question: Is this system mature enough to be tested under real operational conditions?

Pro Tip: Stage 1 is a decision gate. Treat it with the same seriousness as Stage 2.

Common Pitfall: Incomplete hazard analysis or weak evidence of PRP implementation.

Stage 2 Audit: Demonstrating Effective FSMS Implementation

Stage 2 is the operational audit. This is where auditors verify that your FSMS works on the production floor, not just in documents.

Expect auditors to:

  • Walk through your facility
  • Interview staff at different levels
  • Review monitoring and verification records
  • Trace hazards and controls in real time
  • Test traceability and recall capability

Auditors compare three things constantly:

  1. What your procedures say
  2. What your records show
  3. What people actually do

If those three don’t align, nonconformities appear quickly.

Pro Tip: Your system should tell one consistent story—from policy to practice.

Common Pitfall: Procedures that look strong, but operators don’t understand or follow them.

HACCP, CCPs, and OPRPs: Where Auditors Focus the Most

Hazard control is the core of the ISO 22000 audit.

Auditors examine:

  • Hazard identification logic
  • Risk assessment consistency
  • Justification for CCPs and OPRPs
  • Monitoring frequency and limits
  • Corrective actions when limits are exceeded
  • Validation and verification activities
  • Operator competence at control points

Auditors don’t expect perfection, but they expect clarity and control.

Pro Tip: Operators explaining controls in their own words builds far more confidence than memorized definitions.

Common Pitfall: Treating the HACCP plan as a static document instead of a living system.

PRPs, GMPs, and Hygiene Controls

PRPs form the foundation of your FSMS. When they’re weak, everything above them becomes unstable.

Auditors pay close attention to:

  • Cleaning and sanitation practices
  • Personnel hygiene
  • Allergen management
  • Pest control
  • Maintenance and equipment condition
  • Storage and material flow
  • Chemical and waste handling

Most nonconformities occur here because PRPs rely on daily discipline.

Pro Tip: Strong visual control on the floor often reflects a mature FSMS.

Common Pitfall: Well-written PRPs with inconsistent implementation.

Internal Audits, Management Review, and Continual Improvement

Internal audits show whether your organization can evaluate itself honestly.

Auditors expect internal audits to:

  • Cover high-risk processes
  • Be evidence-based
  • Identify real weaknesses
  • Drive corrective actions

Management review should show leadership engagement through:

  • Performance data
  • Nonconformity trends
  • Resource decisions
  • Improvement actions

Pro Tip: Auditors value learning and responsiveness more than “perfect” results.

Common Pitfall: Internal audits performed only to satisfy certification requirements.

Top ISO 22000 Audit Non-Conformities and How to Avoid Them

Certain findings appear repeatedly across audits:

  • Weak PRP implementation
  • CCP or OPRP monitoring gaps
  • Poor document control
  • Ineffective internal audits
  • Traceability weaknesses
  • Superficial corrective actions

These findings usually share one root cause: systems that exist on paper but aren’t reinforced operationally.

Pro Tip: Fix systems, not symptoms.

Common Pitfall: Closing findings without addressing root causes.

Corrective Actions After the Audit: Closing Findings the Right Way

Corrective actions are not about pleasing auditors. They’re about strengthening your FSMS.

Strong corrective actions include:

  • Immediate containment
  • Clear root-cause analysis
  • Practical, systemic actions
  • Verification over time
  • Clear documentation

Auditors expect evidence that actions work—not just that they were planned.

Pro Tip: Verification is what turns a corrective action into a preventive one.

Common Pitfall: Rushing closure without proving effectiveness.

Audit Day Strategy: Communicating Clearly with Auditors

How you communicate during the audit matters.

Best practices include:

  • One audit coordinator
  • Clear, honest answers
  • Evidence-based responses
  • Calm handling of findings
  • Structured opening and closing meetings

Auditors respect clarity and transparency.

Pro Tip: If you don’t know an answer, say so—and show how you’ll verify it.

Common Pitfall: Over-explaining or speculating.

FAQs

How long does an ISO 22000 audit take?
Duration depends on scope, size, and complexity, typically split between Stage 1 and Stage 2.

Can an organization fail an ISO 22000 audit?
Certification isn’t “failed,” but major nonconformities must be corrected before certification proceeds.

What is the best way to pass the audit the first time?
Consistent implementation, strong internal audits, and aligned documentation and practice.

Conclusion: Passing Your ISO 22000 Audit Is About Control, Not Perfection

Passing an ISO 22000 audit the first time doesn’t require perfection. It requires control, consistency, and clarity.

When your FSMS is implemented properly, your team understands their roles, and your records reflect reality, the audit becomes a confirmation—not a confrontation.

Approach the audit as validation of a system you already trust, and success follows naturally.

Share on social media

Leave your thought here

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *