Why Internal Audits Matter During the Move to BRC V9
When teams begin preparing for BRC V9, many focus heavily on updating documents — policies, procedures, training forms, and checklists. That work matters, but it’s only one side of the transition. The real question is: Is the updated system being followed consistently on the floor?
Internal audits are where you find that answer.
In my experience working with companies through transitions, the sites that prioritize internal audits early avoid last-minute surprises, rushed fixes, and stressful pre-audit pressure. The ones that treat it as a “final step” usually spend the weeks before certification scrambling.
By the end of this guide, you’ll know how internal audits should shift under BRC V9, what needs reviewing, and how to structure your audit process so it’s practical, evidence-driven, and aligned with certification expectations.
Internal auditing under BRC V9 isn’t just checking whether documents exist — it’s confirming whether the intent of the requirements is being met in practice. The standard places stronger expectations on:
Verification instead of assumption
Evidence instead of narrative
Trend analysis instead of isolated results
Competence instead of just training attendance
One of the biggest mistakes I’ve seen during V8 to V9 transitions is using outdated audit checklists. The result? Teams miss key areas like cybersecurity, culture metrics, or updated allergen controls — and only realize it during the external audit.
Pro Tip
Update the audit framework early, even if not all documents are finalized yet. An evolving checklist is better than an outdated one.
Updated Scope and Audit Criteria Aligned with BRC V9 Requirements
As you update your audit program, your scope should reflect the new and strengthened clauses in V9. That means reviewing:
Food safety culture evidence (measurable actions, not just a policy)
Allergen labelling accuracy and verification
Cybersecurity vulnerabilities and data protection
Food defence and fraud mitigation evidence
Traceability maturity and justification statements
A client example: their allergen procedure was updated on paper, but operators were still following the old visual cues for label checks. Internal audit caught it — not the certification auditor.
That’s exactly what internal audits are meant to do.
Building the Audit Plan for the Transition Period
Instead of waiting until everything is updated, build a phased audit plan tied to transition readiness. A risk-based schedule works best.
Prioritize audits for:
High-risk processes (allergens, foreign body controls, CCP monitoring)
New requirements (cybersecurity, culture, TACCP/VACCP updates)
Areas that historically generate non-conformities
Schedule follow-up audits for high-risk gaps and areas undergoing change.
Pro Tip
Audit any newly updated procedure within 30–60 days to verify implementation — not just documentation.
Common Pitfall
Conducting one large internal audit right before certification and missing development and follow-up time.
Developing New or Updated Internal Audit Checklists
Your checklist should reflect the intent behind requirements — not just clause wording. That means moving away from yes/no questions and toward:
Observation prompts
Implementation checks
Competency verification
Traceability proof points
Evidence justification
Example shift:
Old Audit Question
V9 Improvement
“Is allergen cleaning documented?”
“Show evidence of allergen cleaning validation, review dates, and trending.”
Auditors will expect depth — not superficial compliance.
Conducting Internal Audits: Practical Techniques for V9 Alignment
Internal audits during the transition should feel more like mini certification audits. That means using:
Document review
Interviews
Floor verification
Traceability walkthroughs
Process challenges
Focus on consistency and capability — not just paperwork.
A recent site audit I supported revealed something familiar: the documentation was excellent, but operators used outdated packaging verification steps because no one updated their work instructions. The internal audit caught the issue early — and fixing it prevented an external non-conformity.
Managing Audit Findings and Corrective Actions During Transition
Not all findings carry the same weight. Prioritize based on food safety risk, compliance level, and operational complexity.
Each corrective action should include:
Root cause analysis
Action plan
Owner
Implementation timeline
Verification method
Evidence of effectiveness
Avoid the trap of “fixing the form.” Fix the system.
Verification and Follow-Up Before Certification
Follow-up is where most transition plans fall short. If actions don’t have closure — they don’t count.
Before your external audit, confirm:
Findings are closed
Evidence is verified
Changes are implemented — not just written
Training and competency records match updated processes
A final internal verification audit was completed
Ideally, this happens 8–12 weeks before certification, not days before.
Template & Toolkit Checklist: What You Should Have in Place
Before closing the transition audit cycle, ensure you have:
Updated internal audit schedule
V9-aligned checklists
Competency evidence for internal auditors
Corrective action tracking and verification
Audit reports with objective evidence
A final readiness or pre-audit assessment
This forms your internal audit evidence pack — auditors will appreciate it.
FAQs
1. Do we need to audit the full system again for V9? Yes — but priority and timing should follow risk and implementation status.
2. Can we reuse our V8 checklists? Only if updated — unchanged V8 checklists will miss key areas.
3. Who should perform transition internal audits? Competent internal auditors or trained external support — cross-functional involvement strengthens results.
Conclusion: Internal Audits Are Your Best Transition Safety Net
Internal audits give you clarity. They confirm whether your updated system works as intended and whether your team is truly prepared for V9 expectations — not just on paper, but in real operations.
If you’re moving into implementation now, the next logical step is building or updating your internal audit schedule and checklists — and planning verification follow-ups before certification.
👋 Hi, I’m HAFSA, and for the past 12 years, I’ve been on a journey to make ISO standards less intimidating and more approachable for everyone.
Whether it’s ISO 9001, ISO 22000, or the cosmetics-focused ISO 22716, I’ve spent my career turning complex jargon into clear, actionable steps that businesses can actually use.
I’m not here to call myself an expert—I prefer “enthusiast” because I truly love what I do.
There’s something incredibly rewarding about helping people navigate food safety and quality management systems
in a way that feels simple, practical, and even enjoyable.
When I’m not writing about standards, you’ll probably find me playing Piano 🎹, connecting with people, or diving into my next big project💫.
I’m an engineer specialized in the food and agricultural industry
I have a Master’s in QHSE management and over 12 years of experience as a Quality Manager
I’ve helped more than 15 companies implement ISO 9001, ISO 22000, ISO 22716, GMP, and other standards
My clients include food producers, cosmetics manufacturers, laboratories, and service companies
I believe quality systems should be simple, useful, and efficient.